Words are our Best Weapon Against the Lies of History (Truth in the Root of the Word).
On January 14, (thru Jan. 17) 2013 I was Kidnapped and Detainment by the Immigration Police and held at a Station in Grønland. They stated I over-stayed my “Visa”. These Immigration Police Officers then went to the U. S. Embassy in Oslo, and retrieved the document (U.S. Passport) that was returned (relinquished) to them in June 2011. (see video, Tellin on the Nazis of Norway)
Original documents (and reference material) I always keep with me, were stolen from my bag while I was being held Against My Will . With the removal of documents and Their possession of others (i.e. passport they retrieved from US Embassy in Oslo); the burden of proof, which lies upon you, becomes difficult to substantiate.
While there I was not given the proper care I requested, not allowed to make a phone call nor shower until just a couple of hours before I was to leave.
|Detained at Grenland politistasjon|
|Besøksadresse||:||Myren 7, Skien|
35 90 64 00
|Telefaks||:||35 90 65 17|
|Engelsk navn||:||Grenland Police Station|
From January 17 (thru 19), 2013 I was detained at The Norwegian Holding Center at Trandum (about 1 hour outside of Oslo near the Airport). At Trandum I was able to use the phones, but was told the phones (system) were not working properly, as to the reason I was not able to make contact with anyone outside.
January 24, 2013, Kidnapped Again by The police at the Immigration office at Christian Kroghs gt 32 (22.34.24.00). I informed the officer, Morten Urdal Johnsen, I was making a SPECIAL APPEARANCE under the Title, Denderah Cherokee Washitaw Brothers El; he signed (and dated) my paperwork to which copies were provided on January 21st. The officer then proceeded to try detain me under the fictitious name, Deondrea BROTHERS BOULANGE, (the name on the passport his office took from the U.S. Embassy in Oslo).
Officer Johnsen then proceeded to produce a paper written in Norwegian, and told me, Denderah Cherokee Washitaw Brothers El, he was taking me to Trandum to be deported to the USA. He and another officer proceeded to physically move me into a side room, and took my belongings. He called other officers and they proceeded to physically move me out of the building into a waiting car and took me against my will to Trandum.
Evidence Produced: Although information was produced showing my stateless status (i.e. the relinquishing of the implied U.S. Citizenship, etc.), the Immigration agents were determined to make me say the passport they had in their possession was me. Later stated by an officer at Trandum, “…something was Wrong with the passport and we can not deport you until it is “FIXED”. I was escorted out of their facility to a waiting Taxi Cab, which took me back to Oslo on January 24, 2013 at 6:00pm.
Regarding Trandum Offier’s statement, “there is something Wrong with the passport”.
Yes, there is:
1. It is NOT me, myself, or I, Denderah Cherokee Washitaw Brothers El. It, Deondrea BROTHERS BOULANGE, is an artificial fictitious vessel belonging to the U.S. Federal Government Corporation (and their International Partners). Which again, is NOT Me.
2. Any implied association (by using said instrument) was relinquished One (1) 1/2 years ago (June 2011). By returning their document to the U.S. Embassy in Oslo. Which has since expired as of December 2012.
3. I AM NOT A U.S. CITIZEN, or CITIZEN OF ANY OTHER NATION or STATE.
I AM considered alien by their terminology and I AM Foreign to their Jurisdiction.
Thus, I AM An Original, Indigenous, Autochthon BEing, commonly thought of as American Indian. However, this is not what we called ourselves. (See article: Six Nations, where congress (Joint House Resolution 331) gives thanks to us for helping them form their original thirteen colonies/ government.)
Press Release: http://beforeitsnews.com/international/2011/06/american-relinquish-u-s-citizenship-to-save-lives-760657.html
Extreme Coercive Charges:
1. Inhumane treatment at police station, Jan 15-17, 2013
2. Retrieving the (relinquished and implied US Citizenship) Passport from the U.S. Embassy in Oslo; an illegal Obstruction of Process.
3. Registering my bodily fingerprints under a fictitious character and Status; thus not complying with the orders of their Judge, Ingeborg Kristin Sunde. (To whom I made a Special Appearance on January 17, 2013, and provided evidence of my Stateless Status and Name Correction, Saksnr:13-010570ENE-OTIR/05)
4.Preventing (and delaying) phone calls at the police station, and the detention center.
5. Immigration Police officer harassment* and extreme berating (he said, he would say I was crazy if I did not accept the passport; and told me he would make notes to “authorities” in other countries of such.)
*Special Note: This is not the first time I have been threatened by the Immigration Police. In January 2012, while trying to apply for asylum, I was told they would not accept me for asylum, and he (a different Officer) would take me to the border, where I would never be heard from again. (see video, Tell’in on the Nazis in Norway)
Due to the use of Extreme Coercive Measures, the UN need to be alerted of Treaty and Human Rights Violations by the Norwegian “Authorities”:
Human Rights Treaties Division (HRTD)(click for Website)
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
52, rue des Pâquis
CH-1201 Geneva (Switzerland)
*Note: Norway has signed treaties to protect Stateless Persons (1954) and Indigenous People (2007).
Convention on Statelessness (1954)
…Convention upholds the right to freedom of movement for stateless persons
lawfully on the territory, and requires States to provide them with identity
papers and travel documents.
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007):
A DUTY TO ALL NATIONS TO COMPLY
Universal Law of Creation
Universal recognition of the inalienable right to self-determination
As an Indigenous Original BEing I cannot be considered a constitutionalist, patriot or any other name associated with/to the Europeans that came and settled in America. Their constitution does not apply to me, nor my kind, the Original Autochthon Indigenous People of the Land. These concepts of land (and humanity) ownership were established by men whose concepts, beliefs and practices are vastly different from our indigenous ways.
Therefore, I, Denderah-Cherokee-Washitaw-Brothers:El (Muir), do not (will not) fulfil the obligations of the corporate fictitious character, Deondrea BROTHERS BOULANGE. Any implied association, with said entity, was relinquished to the U.S. Embassy in Oslo with the return of their Passport in June 2011; and further with the written, announced and published Affidavits of December 2011.
So It Is-Denderah-Cherokee-Washitaw-Brothers:El (Muir)
Declared, January 2013
OVERstand and Innerstand this!
KEY: A stateless person is someone who is “not considered as a national by any state under the operation of its law”
*The causes of statelessness around the world are numerous. In most cases, there is an underlying issue of discrimination – usually on the basis of race or ethnicity
*Two factors are of particular importance: Is the nationality in question acquired automatically, or through some form of registration;– If nationality is acquired automatically, then the person is a national regardless of documentation status.-THIS IS KEY: If registration is required then the person is not a national until that has been completed.
*The United States, which was not an original signatory to the 1954 Convention on the Status of Stateless Persons (However, Norway is an original signatory (bound by signed agreement) to that Treaty), the United States is one of a small number of countries which will allow its “citizens” to renounce their citizenship even if they do not hold any other.
The key to any successful infiltration is through the use of misinformation, propaganda, lies; as well as with the help of the general public.
During the time of the Nazi Occupation, Norway’s own citizens assisted the SS in many of their activities to disenfranchise their fellow country men. These same tactics are used today with the aid of University Students (see comment section below), Professors, Civil service workers and shop keepers. However today they are suited with new technologies, and government compliance, through the formation of new agencies such as the Schengen Act/Agreement. This agreement among European countries, is a tracking and information sharing system of “goods and property”. It is exclusively managed by law enforcement which information is channeled.
For further reading on how this is being misused for nefarious purposes see attached links in the source section at the end of this report.
In relation to the above, this information comes from U.S. Department of State website, it states:
Regional Human Rights Court DecisionsThere are no barriers to access to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) by citizens. During the year through October, the ECHR found for the government in its two cases involving the country. In 2009 the ECHR issued one judgment against the state which found the country had violated the right to respect for private and family life as provided under the European Convention on Human Rights. The government complied with the ECHR judgment by paying the damages assessed.
Civil Judicial Procedures and Remedies
There is an independent and impartial judiciary in civil matters that can adjudicate cases involving human rights violations.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home, or Correspondence
The constitution and law prohibit such actions, and the government generally respected these prohibitions in practice.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The constitution and law provide for freedom of speech and of the press, and the government generally respected these rights in practice. An independent press, an effective judiciary, and a functioning democratic political system combined to ensure freedom of speech and of the press.
The law prohibits “discriminatory or hateful expressions,” defined as “threatening or insulting anyone, or inciting hatred or persecution of or contempt for anyone because of his or her: a) skin color or national or ethnic origin, b) religion or life stance, or c) homosexuality, lifestyle, or orientation.” Violators are subject to a fine or imprisonment not to exceed three years. There were no reported charges or convictions for violating the hate speech law during the year.
There were no government restrictions on access to the Internet or reports that the government monitored e-mail or Internet chat rooms or attempted to collect personally identifiable information. Individuals and groups could engage in the peaceful expression of views via the Internet, including by e-mail. As of the second quarter of the year, according to Statistics Norway, approximately 90 percent of households had Internet access, and 81percent of the population used the Internet daily.
Academic Freedom and Cultural Events
There were no government restrictions on academic freedom or cultural events.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The constitution and law provide for freedom of assembly and association, and the government generally respected these rights in practice.
c. Freedom of Religion
For a complete description of religious freedom, see the 2010 International Religious Freedom Report at www.state.gov/j/drl//irf/rpt/.
d. Freedom of Movement, Internally Displaced Persons, Protection of Refugees, and Stateless Persons
The law provides for freedom of movement within the country, foreign travel, emigration, and repatriation, and the government generally respected these rights in practice. The government cooperated with the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other humanitarian organizations in providing protection and assistance to refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, and other persons of concern.
The law prohibits forced exile, and the government did not employ it.
Protection of Refugees
The law provides for the granting of asylum or refugee status, and the government established a system for providing protection to refugees.
The country is party to the Dublin II regulation, which allows the government to return refugees and asylum seekers to the first country they entered that is also a party to the regulation. As of October the country returned 255 refugees and asylum seekers to Greece, which is a Dublin II regulation country, only on a case-by-case basis. Following a written request by the ECHR in October, the Immigration Appeals Board issued a press release, stating that it would suspend the deportation of asylum seekers to Greece under the Dublin II regulation until the ECHR ruled on the issue in a pending case involving another European country.
In practice the government provided protection against the expulsion or return of refugees to countries where their lives or freedom would be threatened on account of their race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. The government granted refugee status or asylum and accepted refugees for resettlement. NGOs expressed concern, however, regarding the government’s increasing tendency to return persons to areas the UNHCR deemed unsafe, against UNHCR advice. The media reported that, as of the second quarter of the year, authorities had returned 207 refugees to Greece, Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan, and Sri Lanka, reportedly against UNHCR advice. The government responded that it met regularly with the UNHCR and followed most guidelines, but it reviewed each case individually and, following careful research, in some instances did not follow UNHCR advice.
According to the Norwegian Directorate for Immigration (UDI), the government also provided temporary protection to individuals who might not qualify as refugees and provided it to 2,060 persons.
According to UNHCR statistics, there were 2,860 stateless persons in the country as of the end of 2009.
Citizenship is derived from one’s parents; children born in the country do not automatically become citizens. According to government authorities, 95 percent of stateless persons in the country were of Palestinian origin.
Others are mostly from the Baltic countries, where there are unresolved nationality issues for some residents. The law authorizes revocation of Norwegian citizenship granted on the basis of false identity information.
Since the law requires applicants for Norwegian citizenship to renounce their original citizenship, revoking Norwegian citizenship can result in statelessness if the person’s original citizenship is not reinstated.
The government effectively implemented laws and policies to provide stateless persons the opportunity to gain nationality on a nondiscriminatory basis.
[It should be noted the above has no bearing on me. As an Indigenous (Autochthon) BEing, you can never be citizen of a Nation/State/Government.]
Tina Turner to become Swiss citizen and give up U.S. passport (rawstory.com)
Bridging the Gap / Nazi = Freemason = Satanist (Luciferianism)
Your Deeds Will Resound:
Schengen Information System II (SIS II)https://www.datatilsynet.no/English/The-Schengen-Information-System-SIS/